Episode 28
Greatest Evidence that Joseph Smith was a Prophet
Media Player Error
Update your browser or Flash plugin

Greatest Evidence that Joseph Smith was a Prophet

 Episode 28  Comments  Stop Play

So many miracles, revelations...but what is the single greatest evidence of his Divine Calling?

Greatest Evidence that Joseph Smith was a Prophet of God

By Chris Heimerdinger

Okay, I’m determined to do this in 1500 words or less. It deserves more. Truly, I can answer with four words. Some’ll roll their eyes ‘cause, frankly, it’s so predictable! So expected! Yet as I explain it, it’ll make perfect sense. (Drum roll please.) [with cymbal crash, just for flare]

The greatest evidence that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God is the Book of Mormon.

What’d you expect to hear? That he healed Elsa Johnson’s withered arm?[1] Or raised William Huntington from the dead?[2]

No, no. It’s the Book of Mormon.

I gotta add 5 more words: Another Testament of Jesus Christ.

They added that subtitle in 1982, mere months after my baptism. At first, I wasn’t sure I liked it. Many of my friends discouraged me from joining the Church because, said they, Mormons weren’t Christians. Huh? Had they ever read the Book of Mormon’s inside Title Page or sat through a Sacrament Meeting? I knew this was silly, so I thought, “Why appease our critics? We don’t have to apologize to anyone!”

Well, I’m older now, so I say, “Appease away!” That book doesn’t belong to our critics. It belongs to us. Moreover, it belongs to God. If His prophet wants a subtitle, let there be a subtitle. Besides, it identifies exactly what the book is, so . . . Amen and Amen.

You could easily argue that the Book of Mormon is the most influential book of the past 200 years. It has motivated more written words—positive and negative—than any book published in the Western Hemisphere—ever! 200 million copies have been printed in more than 110 languages.[3] Still, in the highbrow world of “literature”, this has little meaning. In 2016, the Library of Congress dubbed it the 4th most influential book that has shaped America. It was beaten out by The Fountainhead, Slaughterhouse Five, and Little House in the Big Woods. If you’ve never heard of those titles, don’t worry. The list is subjective and changes annually according to whims and moods. Yet it’s curious that “most influential” should be ascribed to the two novels at the top of this list, whose combined “copies in print” number less than 12 million. That’s copies ever printed.[4]

The “miracle” is that the Book of Mormon exists at all. For that honor, Joseph must share credit with its ancient authors and compilers, particularly Mormon and Moroni, who painstakingly etched a thousand years’ worth of sacred records onto a single set of plates.

Robert K. Dellenbach of the First Quorum of the Seventy pointed out, way back in 1995, that when the Church undertakes to translate the Book of Mormon into another language, multiple translators are enlisted using computers, word processors, lexicons, and encyclopedias. Each extensive step is critically analyzed by further experts. Even with advanced technology, the process takes about 4 years per translated edition. Joseph and Oliver, having no telephone, no dictation equipment, no word processor, copy machine, or even modern electricity, doing daily chores and under the constant pressure of mobs, translated Mormon and Moroni’s record into English in about 63 working days.[5] Elder Dellenback added:


"I had the glorious experience of quietly examining several pages of Joseph’s original manuscript of the Book of Mormon, which is safely protected in the Church archive. I was overwhelmed at the purity of the transcription, which had only a very few insignificant corrections, such as a misspelled word. Joseph’s original manuscript is so perfect it could only have come from one source—divine revelation."[6]


The miraculous events describing how the Book of Mormon came to be are told and retold: angelic visitations, eyewitness accounts, as well as numerous diabolical efforts to derail its publication (all thwarted). Still, no one alive today was actually there. What remains is the volume itself. And that’s enough. That, and the simplicity of how to know if it’s true, which is outlined in Moroni 10:3-4, and also summarized in James 1:5: “If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God.

That’s not a formula. Not a recipe. It’s an action. An act of faith. A direct promise from a loving God who intimately knows each of our individual needs and will respond.

How does that happen exactly? What does a witness from the Holy Ghost feel like? Many have tried to describe it. A few commonalities emerge—an "overwhelming feeling”, a “burning in the bosom.” However, recipients of this witness often shrug and say, “I just know.” This witness is apparently meant to defy nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs of human language—intentionally! We aren’t supposed to be able to describe it. It’s that sacred. That personal. We must seek it for ourselves. This light—this oil—cannot be shared.

In today’s secular world of science and psychology, where feelings and impressions are routinely dismissed as the byproduct of chemicals, hormones, and ham sandwiches, an effective tactic of the adversary has been to undermine or obliterate anything identified as a spiritual experience. As the host of a popular TV show recently opined, “It’s one thing to talk to Jesus. It’s another thing when Jesus talks to you. That’s mental illness.”[7]

Joseph Smith recorded that the angel Moroni told him that his “name should be had for good and evil among all nations, kindreds, and tongues” (JS-History 1:33). Another of Joseph’s prophecies fulfilled, by the way, for those keeping score at home. For people who believe that the forces of good and evil genuinely exist in this world, this should engender a natural expectation. Listen closely: If the Book of Mormon is true—if it is the greatest single evidence that Joseph Smith was a prophet—the prevailing public outcry should be that people not read it at all. And that’s exactly what we see. Catholic author and scholar Thomas O’Dea may have summarized it best when he said, “the Book of Mormon has not been universally considered by its critics as one of those books that must be read in order to have an opinion of it.”[8]

Clever. You’ve gotta hand it to the Church’s enemies. If I was the adversary, that’s how I’d do it! If I can channel Screwtape, his instructions to Wormwood would be: “Don’t let them touch it. Don’t let them smell it. Don’t even let their eyes linger on a page. Mock and scorn anyone who thinks he must immerse himself in its verses to pass judgment. If he insists, convince him to read only passages circumscribed by damning anti-Mormon rhetoric. Rule #1: NEVER allow man and book—or woman and book (‘cause we know that Screwtape would be meticulously politically correct)—to be alone in the same room or any other setting conducive to quiet contemplation.”

Hey, this strategy of not reading it works! Even for some Church members! Why alter what works? I suppose one might try an argument like this: “How do you knowww Existentialism isn’t true? Have you actually read Kierkegaard or Nietzsche?”

The difference is that no philosophy or organization in modern history has been so bold in its assertions. I don’t just mean miraculous claims about Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon, but the sheer audacity of declaring that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is “the only true and living church upon the face of the whole earth” (D&C 1:30)—the “gatekeeper”, if you will, of all the ordinances of humankind’s salvation and exaltation.  

What might be equally compelling is that no organization with remotely similar assertions can provide such a mountain of documentation. The Church is less than 200 years old! The abundance of material that accompanies its assertions is overwhelming, which is why we strongly advise the simpler route: Just read the book. If it is what it says it is, everything else falls into place. This is why this volume will forever remain the greatest single evidence of Joseph Smith’s divine calling.

Elder Jeffrey R. Holland, while bearing his own powerful testimony of the Book of Mormon, quoted his grandfather, George Cannon: “No wicked man could write such a book as this; and no good man would write it, unless it were true and he were commanded of God to do so.”[9]

Such statements ought to be verifiable. Testable. You deserve to know, no matter your intelligence, background, or circumstances. I declare that you can know. To anyone who harbors doubts about Joseph Smith, we invite you to read the evidence that the prophet left us: The Book of Mormon, Another Testament of Jesus Christ.


[1] A Comprehensive History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1:278; "Philo Dibble Autobiography (1806-c. 1843)," in "Early Scenes in Church History," Four Faith Promoting Classics (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1968), 79.

[2] Levi Curtis, "Recollections of the Prophet Joseph Smith," Juvenile Instructor 27, no. 12, 15 June 1892: 385-86.

[3] Elder D. Todd Christofferson, Transcript at Library of Congress, 12/7/2016.

[4] In 2016 bloombergquint.com reported that The Fountainhead by Ayn Ran had sold about 6.5 million copies. In 2012 Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut was estimated to have sold 5 million copies (http://antickmusings.blogspot.com/2012/11).

[5] John W. Welch and Tim Rathbone, “The Translation of the Book of Mormon: Basic Historical Information,” Provo, Utah: F.A.R.M.S., 1986, p. 14.

[6] Robert K. Dellenbach, “Translation Miracle of the Book of Mormon”, Ensign, May 1995, 9.

[7] Joy Behar, “The View”, American Broadcasting Company (ABC), 2/13/2018

[8] Thomas F. O’Dea, The Mormons (University of Chicago Press, 1957), 26.

[9] George Cannon, quoted in “The Twelve Apostles,” in Andrew Jenson, ed., The Historical Record, 6:175.



  • David Doty father of Sam

    Mar 13, 2018 5:25 am

    Wow, Chris! It’s really hard to find the words. Just beautiful! I love the notations and attributions. I’m going to play this for our next family home evening.

    This is the first of your blogs that I have read/heard. I’m now going to start with #1.

    And thanks, again, for Tennis Shoes Among The Nephites!!


  • David Doty father of Sam

    Mar 13, 2018 5:25 am

    Wow, Chris! It’s really hard to find the words. Just beautiful! I love the notations and attributions. I’m going to play this for our next family home evening.

    This is the first of your blogs that I have read/heard. I’m now going to start with #1.

    And thanks, again, for Tennis Shoes Among The Nephites!!


  • Todd Purser

    Mar 13, 2018 9:43 am

    I will agree with you, there is a mountain of documentation…much of it not favorable to the narrative set forth by the church or this piece. I am not ‘anti-mormon’. I am active and hold a calling – but much like our LDS historian Richard Bushman, I can’t help but consider a more nuanced view of the Book of Mormon, what it is and how it came to be....

    RESPONSE FROM CHRIS: You'll notice--undoubtedly--that I "trimmed" most of your comment. Sorry about that. A genuine no-no in commentary etiquette. But offering so many intellectual assertions without specific examples is deceptive on its face and wastes a readers' time. Yours is a general diatribe, popular of late, that seeks to place the Book of Mormon within a 19th century framework. Oh, and my antennae always spikes when someone feels they must start by saying "I am active and hold a calling". We all recognize the peculiar and head-scratching phenomenon of the "cultural Mormon". I did an entire podcast on the topic.

    Despite Bushman's "nuanced" contortions, one cannot ignore that if Joseph or Oliver "plagiarized" long passages from extant sermons and texts of 19th century authors, the Book of Mormon would, at its core, be the work of self-aware charlatans (in case the term "charlatans" doesn't already confirm "self-aware"). This accusation is as old as E.B. Howe and Mormonism Unveiled! For your approach to "make the cut" you must present an honest discussion, including an acknowledgement of apologetic critiques of Bushman's work--of which there are many--such as Peterson's response to Rough Stone Rolling (a book that caused me to crinkle my forehead at practically every page as I considered Bushman's "stretches" to justify flawed conclusions. And this was when I thought this book was merely a simple history of Joseph Smith instead of a (subtle) "anti-LDS" text!)

    I invite you to "cut and paste" some the supposed "passages" that Bushman claims Joseph "lifted" from extant sermons or writings of his day (that you claim can be "Googled"). But before you do so, be honest enough to also present links (or a bibliography) to those apologetics and critiques that specifically address individual claims. You are then invited to refute THOSE, but to imply to my readership that such answers and responses don't exist would, frankly, make YOU the charlatan.

    As a final comment, the first thing that struck me as inherently flawed about Bushman's accounts of Joseph in Rough Stone Rolling was how Joseph was so much more "educated" than the traditional LDS account suggests. His arguments are weak and silly. I was 24 years old once, too. College educated. Even hard at work on my first novel. To suggest that Joseph was so well-read and familiar with the contemporary theological arguments of his times, or that he had access to the texts that Bushman proposes, was never remotely convincing.

  • Randall Brower

    Mar 13, 2018 7:41 pm

    Will you entertain any comments that push back on your version of historical realities?

    RESPONSE FROM CHRIS: Depends upon how honest, cliche', or responsible your "push back" is. Legitimate ideas, if they counter my own, are great. However, many of those who pursue this tact arrogantly presume that I don't know, or that I'm totally ignorant, of the ideas or philosophies they present. Most, rather than enlighten ME, seek, instead, to hijack my forum and podium to circumvent my "version of reality" to dupe others. If THAT is your agenda, nah, I wouldn't be particularly "entertaining". An obvious "give away" would be if your push back is a long diatribe that would require an even LONGER counter diatribe. Stick with one idea, and don't grandstand.
  • Annie Lee

    Mar 19, 2018 8:37 am

    Brother Heimerdinger, I have always loved that your testimony glows with your testimony. Your love of the Lord and his gospel can be felt in every word you write. It’s one of the reason that your books have a treasured spot on my bookshelf.
    I loved the article, and the courage, strength and intelligence with which you defend your statements. A great read sir. Thank you! Sharing this immediately.

  • Jason Campbell

    Mar 20, 2018 7:27 am

    I have studied the Book of Mormon extensively and I am amazed at how well the historical data fits together. Later prophets reference previous events and quote prophets like Nephi and king Benjamin, and it all fits. Anyone who has tried to write a book knows how difficult that is especially a big this large with extensive references to biblical and historical events. The second thing that stands out to me are the different voices and authors. How different is no-nonsense, blunt, Jacob from his kind and compassionate older brother Nephi. Look at warrior leaders like Mormon and Moroni and compare their writing style to Alma the elder or the poetic imagery of Alma the younger and king Benjamin to simple and succinct Jarom. With each evidence the likelihood of an 19th century authorship becomes less and less possible, especially when you consider the evidence of it taking about 63 working days to produce the book and the age and inexperience of Joseph and Oliver. I have a doctorate. I have read extensively. As a scientist weighing the evidence I am convinced that the only explanation that works for the Book of Mormon is that it was written by ancient prophets and translated by the gift and power of God. Any other explanation is intellectually dishonest and frivilous if one really does carefully consider the evidence. Not to mention the absolutely life changing power of the text and witness of the Holy Ghost I, and millions of others, have received confirming its veracity. The Book of Mormon is the word of God and Joseph Smith was a prophet chosen by God to bring it to the world.

  • Jared Fowles

    Mar 27, 2018 9:05 am

    Thank you Chris! I agree with you completely about the Book of Mormon being the best evidence for Joseph being a true prophet. The more I study, the more I’m convinced it truly is a marvelous work and a wonder that could not be done without the power of God.

  • Darryl White

    Sep 8, 2018 12:12 pm

    Comment on episode 28:

    I am imagining a back and forth much like the Babelfish argument in The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy.

    Man to God: You keep stressing the importance of faith, right?

    God to Man: Yes, men need to have faith in me.

    Man to God: So, what about the Book Of Mormon? I mean, it’s kind of a dead giveaway, isn’t it? There’s no way that book can be real without you being real. You may now disappear in a puff of logic.

    God To Man: You misunderstand. Faith isn’t for me, it’s for you.

Leave a comment